thoughts on things

mrseb's raw stream

Psychiatric diagnosis? Pah! Here comes neurological diagnosis!

via ted.com

Watch it, it's only 7 minutes. I think you'll find it unsurprising that most people have tagged it as 'jaw-dropping'.

She makes an incredibly good point, and one that strikes very close to some ideas that have been whizzing around my brain recently. Why do we use physical manifestations to diagnose mental pathology?

We actually diagnose things like depression, ADHD and autism based on observed behaviour. No proof, no science, just... interpretation of physical manifestation. It's crazy. It's barbaric. It's like using leeches to suck out your melancholia. It really makes no sense, when you think about it -- as the speaker says in the video: we don't diagnose a heart condition without first using the technology available! In fact, you'd probably get a medical malpractice suit if you did -- yet psychiatrists continue to diagnose children with reckless abandon.

As you can see from the talk, we now have the technology to scan the brain and deduce any extant mental maladies with excellent accuracy. It's safe, it's quick and it's non-invasive. Look at those happy children in the video! Marvel (or glumly gawp) at how many kids with autism, ADHD or any other learning disability might be suffering from something else -- something that can be remedied with non-psychoactive drugs. 

Filed under  //   adhd   autism   brain   disability   disorder   drugs   mental   psychology   technology   ted  
Posted June 29, 2010

Hire the geniuses

I've been watching Boston Legal recently. In it there's a character called Alan Shore who uses his passionate, mellifluous voice to devastating effect in courtroom closing arguments. In an episode I just watched he argues that the U.S. government should 'hire the geniuses', rather than public sector contractor cronies. It's not actually his best closing (his 'Free Religion' one is amazing), but later, talking to his buddy Denny Crane, he says it a lot more succinctly:

Hire the geniuses, not the guy who’s got the best lobbyist, or the rich friend who’ll take you to his quail ranch and let you shoot ‘em. Hire the thinkers [...] Instead of every Tom, Dick and Brownie, let’s turn our visionaries loose.

He makes a damn good point. You would be flabbergasted at the amount of money that governments around the world spend on bloated public sector contracts. Imagine giving 'The Steves' (Jobs, Wozniak, Ballmer) just a tiny fraction of the $3.5 trillion that the U.S government spends each year.

Just recently news emerged that cops in Massachusetts will soon be equipped with souped-up iPhones capable of making positive identifications in the field. I mean... what the frak? Why are police only now being equipped with technology that has been in the hands of consumers for years?!

I wonder what the world would be like if our teachers, police and other civil servants had access to the same technology as bleeding-edge tech-savvy consumers. Surely it would be good to put advanced technology in the hands of those that spend their days trying to improve society.

Filed under  //   alan shore   america   boston legal   closing   government   speech   spending   technology   us  
Posted June 19, 2010

David Byrne: How architecture helped music evolve

Not the best-delivered talk I've ever heard -- and he definitely loses it a bit towards the end -- but still, it's interesting.

I'm sure I've heard the artistic 'limited by the shape of the vessel' argument before, I'm just not sure where.

I guess a portable MP3 player is simply a tool. Much like a painter's work extends beyond the canvas, to the frame, to where it will hang.

And if you agree -- if form really does limit function -- then surely that puts engineers above artists.

I wonder if Michelangelo would've invented the chisel, if someone hadn't done it before him...

Filed under  //   architecture   engineering   music   technology   ted  
Posted June 13, 2010