thoughts on things

mrseb's raw stream

Schools kill creativity

via ted.com

Look! Another TED talk that agrees with me exactly!

It's always weird, when you have very strong prevailing ideologies, to find someone that thinks or writes or speaks in exactly the same way.

In this talk, he probably spends too much time being funny (but he is funny), but by the end he builds a fantastic case; a case that I think almost every sensible being will agree with.

My earliest rant on education focused heavily on empowering teachers -- something that I later refined into depoliticizing of education and school specialization. Ken Robinson's anecdote about the ballet dancer at the end of the speech is perfect, to say the least.

I had never considered the 'education is a 19th century construct for the sole consumption by the burgeoning industrial sector' point of view though. Now I can see that it's not so much that education has been politicized -- more that our societal values (or at least those extolled by politicians?) need to be reworked.

For further reading (or watching), check out Charles Leadbeater's recent talk on 'education innovation': http://www.ted.com/talks/charles_leadbeater_on_education.html. Basically, our current model of teaching with teachers doesn't scale to a world with billions of Indians, Chinese, Brazilians, Nigerians -- other methods of teaching are required!

Filed under  //   arts   crafts   education   industrial   ken robinson   student   teaching   ted  
Posted June 24, 2010

Etymology: -phil- (φίλος)

Suffixes with the common part -phil- (-phile, -philia, -philic) are used to specify some kind of attraction or affinity to something, in particular the love or obsession with something. They are antonymic to suffixes -phob-.

Phil- (Philo-) may also be used as a prefix with a similar meaning.

I think I've told you about my love of etymology.

For me, there's nothing as divine as true understanding -- and the first barrier to understanding is not actually understanding the words.

Now, admittedly, you could go through life without ever knowing the roots of words. Most people do. But the added richness of knowing derivations, the additional nuance and flavour... well, to me it's unrivalled!

Call me a nerd, but I just LOVE that little lip-formed 'o' that people make when I tell them the derivation of a word. Sometimes it's a vapid 'o' of not-quite-understanding, but sometimes it's of the omg-my-world-view-has-just-totally-changed variety.

To the case in point: philia, philos, phil -- Greek (φίλος) for 'beloved' or 'dear'. Now, you certainly know the suffix form -- paedophile, cinephilia, Anglophilic. But the prefix form... ahhh!

Philosophy! A love of wisdom.

Philadelphia! Brotherly love.

Philanthropy! Love of fellow humans.

Philanderer! Loving or fond of men (but probably after someone called Philander).

But the word I was actually looking up, which led me to 'phil', is Philharmonic. It's just one of those words that you see around -- but I bet you didn't know what it means. Until now! It literally means 'the beloved sound'. Very simple, yet I bet most orchestras don't even know why they're called 'philharmonic'.

There, done. That wasn't too boring, was it?

Filed under  //   derivation   education   etymology   greek   phil   philanthropy   philharmonic   philosophy   root  
Posted June 21, 2010